top of page

How to Build Team Readiness for Automation Success

  • Writer: Lauren Ethridge
    Lauren Ethridge
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 5 min read

When most leaders talk about automation, the focus is almost always on the what: what systems to install, what technology delivers the best ROI, what solution will solve today’s pain points.


But here’s the truth: automation rarely fails because of the robots. It fails because of how the project is scoped, supported, and sustained. In our experience, automation projects fall apart for three main reasons:


  1. A mismatch between solution and need. Too often, the system is oversold or designed in a vacuum without considering upstream and downstream impact. The result? A shiny new tool that doesn’t actually solve the right problem.

  2. An incomplete understanding of ongoing maintenance. From slotting strategies to software updates to mechanical upkeep, automation requires ongoing optimization and maintenance. Many companies underestimate what it takes to keep systems running at peak performance.

  3. Team readiness. Even the best-designed system will struggle if the people who run it aren’t prepared, trained, or aligned. And that’s the focus of this article.


The warehouse floor is filled with people who need to learn new processes, managers who need to adapt their leadership style, and executives who need to rethink how they measure performance. If the human side isn’t ready, the technology won’t deliver on its promise.


Think of it like teaching someone who’s used to a cable box and VCR how to navigate a smart TV. The core activity, watching shows, hasn’t changed. But the tools, menus, and expectations are completely different. It takes time, training, and a willingness to shift how you think about the task. Automation is no different: the work is still fulfillment, but the way you get there requires new skills and a new mindset.


At Zion Solutions Group, we’ve learned that the best automation journeys start by asking: Is our team ready?


1. Mindset Matters

Automation often stirs up two opposite reactions: excitement about efficiency and fear about disruption. Both are valid. But if fear is left unaddressed, it can become resistance—and resistance kills momentum.

Employees may quietly wonder:


  • Will this machine take my job?

  • What if I can’t learn this new system?

  • Why change what’s working today?


Leaders who ignore these questions create a culture of doubt. Leaders who acknowledge them create trust.


The companies that succeed frame automation as an enabler, not a replacement. They show teams how automation removes repetitive strain, reduces walking time, and makes jobs safer, not how it eliminates roles. They point out the career paths that open up when workers move from manual tasks to higher-value roles like system oversight, data analysis, or process improvement.

Mindset isn’t just about frontline employees, either. Managers and executives must shift from a mindset of “getting more out of people” to “getting more with people through technology.” That’s a big cultural change, and it doesn’t happen without intentional communication.


2. Skills and Training Gaps

Even the most advanced systems aren’t push-button simple. Automation requires people who know how to run it, maintain it, and interpret the data it generates.


The challenge? The skills that made your team successful yesterday aren’t always the skills they’ll need tomorrow. A picker who’s great at speed and accuracy may now need to learn how to manage automated picking systems. A supervisor who used to walk the floor checking orders may now need to read dashboards and spot process bottlenecks.


That doesn’t mean replacing your team. It means investing in them. Upskilling and reskilling are the foundation of sustainable automation.

Strong companies take a proactive approach:


  • Baseline assessments to understand current skill levels.

  • Training plans that combine vendor education with real-world practice.

  • Cross-training opportunities so employees can grow into new roles.

  • Leadership development to help managers guide teams through change.


But sometimes, training alone isn’t enough, especially when the project is large, complex, or high-risk. Major transformations benefit from leaders who have been there before.


Many supply chain executives specialize in operational transformation. They’ve led multiple large-scale projects, have seen the pitfalls, and know how to anticipate what’s around the corner. They understand how to coordinate teams across multiple companies, technology vendors, integrators, and operators, and they often bring trusted partners they’ve worked with in the past.


If this is your first major automation project, or the first of many to come, it often pays to bring in that kind of expertise. Whether it’s a seasoned internal leader or an outside consulting or integration partner, transformation leadership helps bridge the gap: guiding the project, organizing the team, and training your people to operate confidently in the “new normal” of automated distribution.


The ROI is real. Employees who feel supported and invested in are more engaged, more loyal, and more capable of helping automation succeed. On the flip side, companies that skip training or underestimate the need for experienced leadership often find themselves with expensive systems that sit underutilized because no one really knows how to make them work.


3. Ownership and Accountability

Here’s one of the most common reasons automation underperforms: once the vendor leaves, no one truly owns it.


If it’s “IT’s system,” operations won’t take responsibility. If it’s “operations’ system,” IT may not prioritize supporting it. And if leadership assumes the system will “run itself,” it quickly falls into neglect.


Successful companies draw clear lines of ownership before the system goes live. They define:


  • Who manages the data and ensures accuracy.

  • Who maintains the equipment and schedules downtime.

  • Who interprets the reports and turns insights into action.

  • Who measures ROI and communicates results to leadership.


Ownership isn’t just about assigning tasks, it’s about accountability. When teams know exactly who’s responsible, systems get cared for, data gets used, and automation drives real improvement.


Think of automation like adding a new department to your company. If no one is in charge of it, it will drift. If the right people are empowered to own it, it will thrive.


4. Culture of Continuous Improvement

Automation isn’t a one-and-done project, it’s a living system that evolves with your business. The companies that get the most out of their investment don’t just “set it and forget it.” They build a culture of continuous improvement.


That culture shows up in small but important ways:


  • Operators are encouraged to share feedback on how systems actually function day to day.

  • Managers experiment with new workflows, measure the impact, and iterate quickly.

  • Leaders celebrate small wins, reinforcing that change is part of progress.


It also shows up in how problems are framed. Instead of asking, “What’s wrong with this automation?” strong teams ask, “How can we make this automation work better for us?”


Continuous improvement means embracing the idea that automation will never be “finished.” There will always be updates, adjustments, and opportunities to optimize. Teams that expect and welcome that reality are positioned to win long-term.


Bringing It All Together

Automation is powerful, but it isn’t magic. The technology is only as strong as the people who run it, maintain it, and use it to improve the business.


If your team has the right mindset, the right skills, clear ownership, and a culture of continuous improvement, your automation investment is far more likely to succeed.


At Zion Solutions Group, we don’t just design automation systems, we help build the readiness and resilience your people need to make them work. Because the question isn’t just, “Is your warehouse ready for automation?” The deeper question is, “Is your team ready?”


 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page